vane, Nvidia Core i5.
KingThrillgore, Two problems, they are big ones:
- The hardware is expensive for a marginal improvement
- The games coming out that best leverage the features like Ray tracing are also expensive and not good
geneva_convenience, By rendering only 25% of the frames we made DLSS4 100% faster than DLSS3. Which only renders 50% of the frames! - NVIDIA unironically
vane, More Shenanigans. Moooore !
moonlight, I think it's going to be a long time before I upgrade my graphics card with these prices.
Zarxrax, LOL, their demo shows Cyberpunk running at a mere 27fps on the 5090 with DLSS off. Is that supposed to sell me on this product?
Poopfeast420, The 4090 gets like sub 20fps without DLSS and stuff. Seems like a good improvement.
kat, Barely
Poopfeast420, 50% improvement not enough for you?
Blackmist, Their whole gaming business model now is encouraging devs to stick features that have no hope of rendering quickly in order to sell this new frame generation rubbish.
deur, Okay losers, time for you to spend obscene amounts to do your part in funding the terrible shit company nvidia.
Murvel, Okay loser, so what GPU should we buy then?
rautapekoni, A used 2080.
Add comment